Supported API
Prefer documented endpoints with scoped service identities, stable contracts, and auditable responses.
The safe pattern is to preserve the ERP as the system of record, give the agent the smallest necessary data and tool surface, and separate read, recommendation, draft, and confirmed-write authority.
By Onyx Devs Lab · Published · Updated
The connector should match available interfaces and business risk.
Prefer documented endpoints with scoped service identities, stable contracts, and auditable responses.
Use controlled copies for analytics when operational load or vendor access makes direct reads unsuitable.
Treat browser or desktop mediation as a constrained last-mile adapter with explicit monitoring and takeover.
A useful agent is not automatically entitled to act.
Natural-language questions can produce evidence-linked answers without creating business mutations.
The agent prepares a transaction or decision for a named operator to review.
Consequential actions require validation, idempotency, permission checks, confirmation, and post-action verification.
Identify ownership for customers, products, inventory, finance, and workflow state.
Specify inputs, outputs, permissions, failure behavior, and audit fields.
Evaluate missing data, conflicting records, stale state, retries, and unauthorised requests.
Start read-only, then graduate specific actions only when evidence supports it.
No. A separate AI and data layer can add retrieval, recommendations, and workflows while the ERP remains authoritative.
Possible alternatives include approved exports, read replicas, event feeds, or controlled interface automation. Each has different freshness, reliability, and governance trade-offs.
Only narrowly defined actions should gain write authority, with server-side permission checks, validation, idempotency, explicit confirmation where needed, and outcome verification.
We will first clarify the workflow, evidence, data boundary, and outcome standard before recommending the next step.
Contact Onyx